Subject: Apology & Explanation, Dr. Wanis
Dear Dr. Wanis,
I want to sincerely apologize for wearing the Lucifer Angels baseball hat. I understand how it may have come across, and I assure you, it wasn’t meant as a statement of belief or defiance. It was a move in a larger game—one that involved Kevin Cuthbert and a chess match between me and the so-called Japanese messiah.
Kevin asked for the hat. I knew what he wanted, and I knew what it symbolized in his mind. So I took it first—not to wear it with pride, but to thwart him. Sometimes, the best way to throw off an opponent is to take the move they think they own.
But that game is over now. I’ve got a Mike Trout hat instead. A better fit, a better name. No more symbols that can be twisted, no more unnecessary controversy. Just baseball.
And, while I’m apologizing, I need to say sorry for breaking your computer. I was frustrated—frustrated that you wouldn’t study my Revelation. I believed I had something important to share, and when I felt dismissed, I let my anger get the better of me. That wasn’t right.
I let my emotions take control, and I regret it. You didn’t deserve that.
I hope you can forgive me for both. I still respect you, and I still believe in the work you do.
Sincerely,
Joe Jukic
The Protocols of Zion: A Blueprint for Totalitarian Control Used by Both Hitler and Stalin
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is one of the most infamous forgeries in modern history, a fabricated document claiming to outline a secret Jewish plan for global domination. First published in Russia in the early 20th century, the text was later exposed as a hoax, yet its influence spread worldwide, fueling antisemitic conspiracy theories and justifying oppressive policies. Ironically, while both Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin publicly denounced the Protocols, their regimes mirrored many of its so-called “strategies” in their totalitarian rule. Whether knowingly or not, both dictators implemented methods outlined in the Protocols to control their populations, consolidate power, and justify brutal purges.
1. Centralization of Power and the Cult of Leadership
One of the Protocols’ main themes is the necessity of a centralized, dictatorial authority that manipulates democracy to install a supreme ruler. Both Hitler and Stalin rose to absolute power by subverting democratic institutions:
Hitler exploited Germany’s fragile democracy, using the Reichstag Fire to justify emergency powers and establish a dictatorship. He presented himself as Germany’s sole savior, a messianic figure whose authority was unquestionable.
Stalin eliminated political rivals through purges, show trials, and forced confessions. By the late 1930s, he had transformed the Soviet Union into a dictatorship, where questioning his leadership meant death. Like Hitler, he promoted a cult of personality, ensuring his image was omnipresent in Soviet life.
2. The Use of Propaganda and Thought Control
The Protocols suggest controlling the press and spreading propaganda to shape public perception. Hitler and Stalin mastered this tactic:
The Nazi regime controlled all media, publishing antisemitic propaganda through Der Stürmer, glorifying Hitler in Mein Kampf, and using films like Triumph of the Will to rally the masses.
The Soviet Union controlled all news outlets, rewriting history to fit Stalin’s narrative. Soviet newspapers like Pravda (“Truth”) were anything but truthful, and dissidents were erased from photographs and textbooks.
Both regimes ensured that independent thought was crushed—Hitler through book burnings and Nazi education, Stalin through forced ideological conformity under the Communist Party.
3. Suppression of Free Speech and the Elimination of Opposition
The Protocols describe how dissent must be eradicated to ensure total control. Hitler and Stalin took this lesson to the extreme:
Hitler’s Gestapo arrested political dissidents, sending them to concentration camps or executing them outright. Even prominent Nazis were not safe—Hitler purged potential rivals in the Night of the Long Knives (1934).
Stalin’s NKVD (later the KGB) conducted mass arrests during the Great Purge (1936-1938), sending millions to the gulags. Even loyal Communists were accused of treason and executed in show trials.
4. Economic Manipulation and State Control
The Protocols claim that economic crises should be engineered to consolidate power. Both Hitler and Stalin manipulated their nations’ economies to serve their political goals:
The Nazis rebuilt Germany’s economy by rearming for war, confiscating Jewish businesses, and implementing state-controlled capitalism under the guise of nationalism.
The Soviets destroyed private enterprise with forced collectivization, leading to famine (such as the Holodomor in Ukraine), yet ensuring total dependency on the state for survival.
Both regimes maintained economic control by keeping their populations in a state of fear and dependency.
5. Use of Fear and Terror to Maintain Power
The Protocols suggest that fear should be a tool of governance. Hitler and Stalin ruled through terror:
Hitler’s SS and Gestapo arrested Jews, political opponents, and “undesirables,” sending them to concentration camps where millions perished. The Holocaust was the ultimate expression of governance through terror.
Stalin’s secret police arrested perceived enemies of the state, often in the middle of the night. The gulags became labor camps where millions were worked to death.
By making terror a routine part of life, both regimes ensured obedience and prevented rebellion.
6. Divide and Conquer: Fostering Internal Enemies
The Protocols emphasize creating internal enemies to justify authoritarian measures. Both Hitler and Stalin needed scapegoats:
Hitler blamed Jews, Communists, and “traitors” for Germany’s problems, using antisemitic laws and propaganda to unite the nation under Nazism.
Stalin accused entire ethnic groups and political factions of sabotage, exiling entire populations like the Crimean Tatars and Chechens, and executing former allies under paranoia-fueled purges.
By directing public anger at an enemy, both dictators strengthened their grip on power.
7. The Promise of a “New Order”
The final idea in the Protocols is that a new world order should replace the old. Both Hitler and Stalin pursued their own visions of an absolute ideological utopia:
Hitler’s “New Order” was a world where Aryans ruled supreme and all “lesser races” were exterminated or enslaved.
Stalin’s Communist utopia was a global socialist revolution where all opposition was crushed under the hammer and sickle.
Both dictators sought to reshape the world in their own image, and both ultimately failed—but not before leaving millions dead in their wake.
Conclusion: The Protocols as a Mirror of Totalitarianism
While the Protocols of Zion were a fraudulent document designed to incite antisemitism, their methods for achieving total control eerily mirror the strategies used by both Hitler and Stalin. Neither dictator needed the Protocols to understand how to consolidate power—history has shown that all totalitarian regimes follow similar patterns. The real tragedy is that millions suffered under rulers who embraced these methods, proving that tyranny knows no ideology, only the ruthless pursuit of absolute dominance.
Edmond de Rothschild and the Protocols of Zion: Rumors, Bastard Bloodlines, and the Altar Boys Who Became Tyrants
The Rothschild banking dynasty has long been at the center of conspiracy theories, with claims of their financial influence stretching across the globe. One of the most persistent rumors involves Baron Edmond de Rothschild, a key figure in European banking and Zionist movements, allegedly financing the infamous Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Though the Protocols have been thoroughly debunked as a fabrication, their origins remain murky, fueling speculation that they were a deliberate piece of psychological warfare—perhaps even funded as controlled opposition.
Adding to the intrigue, another rumor claims that both Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin were illegitimate descendants of the Rothschild family, their childhoods eerily similar as poor altar boys who rose to become two of history’s most brutal dictators. If these rumors hold any weight, they suggest that the world’s greatest enemies may have been shaped by the very same bloodline they opposed.
Edmond de Rothschild: The Phantom Financier of the Protocols?
Baron Edmond de Rothschild (1845–1934) was a well-known patron of Jewish settlements in Palestine and a major figure in European banking. However, some theories suggest a more shadowy role—that he financed the creation and distribution of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion to serve a larger geopolitical agenda.
The Protocols, first published in Russia in the early 1900s, were quickly embraced by anti-Semitic groups as evidence of a Jewish conspiracy to dominate the world. Yet, some researchers question whether the document was actually designed to weaponize antisemitism for political control. If Rothschild money was behind its creation, could it have been meant to create a false narrative, manipulating public opinion and justifying repressive crackdowns?
Though no hard evidence directly links Edmond de Rothschild to the Protocols, the financial elite have long understood the power of manufacturing crisis to consolidate influence. The document’s arrival at a time of rising nationalism and political instability suggests it may have served as a strategic tool—possibly even for factions within the Rothschild empire who played both sides of the ideological war.
Hitler & Stalin: The Rothschild Bastard Sons?
One of the most persistent theories surrounding Hitler and Stalin is that they were both illegitimate offspring of the Rothschild family, placing them at the heart of a bloodline that allegedly orchestrated global events from behind the scenes.
Adolf Hitler: The Hidden Heir of Vienna?
A longstanding theory suggests that Hitler’s paternal grandfather was Salomon Mayer von Rothschild, a powerful Austrian banker. Hitler’s grandmother, Maria Anna Schicklgruber, was working as a servant in a Rothschild household in Vienna when she became pregnant. The family quickly arranged financial support and sent her away to give birth, ensuring that the scandal never reached high society.
Whether true or not, the theory gained traction due to Hitler’s intense hatred for both the Rothschilds and his own ancestry. He ordered all records of his family origins to be sealed and destroyed, and some reports suggest the Gestapo wiped out entire villages in Austria to erase his past. Was this simply paranoia, or was he covering up an inconvenient truth?
Joseph Stalin: The Georgian Ghost of the Rothschilds?
Stalin’s rumored connection to the Rothschilds follows a similar path. His mother, Ekaterine Geladze, worked as a housemaid in Georgia, where she allegedly had an affair with a wealthy foreigner. Some accounts point to a Rothschild businessman operating in the region, who may have secretly fathered the future Soviet dictator.
Like Hitler, Stalin was an altar boy in his youth, a poor child raised under strict religious discipline before turning to radical politics. Both men went from serving the Church to embracing totalitarianism, rejecting their supposed Jewish ties while using antisemitic narratives for political gain. Stalin, despite being a Marxist, actively purged Jews from positions of power in the Soviet Union, much like Hitler did in Nazi Germany.
If either dictator truly carried Rothschild blood, it would raise chilling questions. Were they merely rogue sons rebelling against their heritage, or were they allowed to rise to power as part of a grander plan—two opposing forces, financed by the same hidden hand, driving the world into chaos?
The Altar Boys Who Became Monsters
Both Hitler and Stalin shared an unlikely beginning:
Altar Boys Turned Tyrants – Each was raised in strict religious households, serving in the Church before turning against it.
Obsessed with Jewish Conspiracies – Hitler waged genocide against Jews, while Stalin purged Jewish intellectuals, despite their rumored ancestry.
Eliminating Rothschild Influence – Hitler seized Rothschild-owned banks in Austria, and Stalin nationalized industries tied to Western banking elites.
Despite their supposed opposition, both dictators ruled using the exact same playbook, mirroring the strategies outlined in the Protocols of Zion. If the Protocols were truly a template for authoritarian control, then Hitler and Stalin followed every step—whether by fate, by manipulation, or by blood.
Conclusion: A Scripted History?
The idea that Hitler and Stalin were illegitimate Rothschild descendants is impossible to confirm, but it raises unsettling possibilities. If true, it suggests that the world’s most devastating wars were fought between rival factions of the same powerful lineage.
Whether Edmond de Rothschild financed the Protocols of Zion as a form of controlled opposition or whether Hitler and Stalin were orchestrated pawns in a larger game, one truth remains: history, as told by the victors, is rarely the full story.
The real question is—who wrote the script? And who continues to write it today?